Talk:Tricastin

upgrade plans[edit]

Planning an upgrade, based mostly on the fr article, with the following tentative structure, details t.b.d: Tentative structure for this page

1 History
2 Environment
  2.1 Geography
  2.2 Geology (including soil)
  2.3 Climate
3 Economy
  3.1 wine 
  3.2 energy
    3.2.1 nuclear power (brief, including see main article link)
  3.3 tourism
4 Culture - gastronomy, festivals
5 Notes and references
6 See also
7 Related Items
8 External links

Mathglot (talk) 00:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright compliance[edit]

Somewhere, I read that I need to add this template to the talk page, to ensure compliance. So here it is. Not sure why it shouldn't rather go on the main article page, though. It's not just a translation, there are other changes as well; and in any case, the original is also a moving target. Mathglot (talk) 10:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tricastin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090813084458/http://www.vins-rhone.com:80/fr/2620-Coteaux%20du%20Tricastin.html to http://www.vins-rhone.com/fr/2620-Coteaux%20du%20Tricastin.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]