This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 14:47, May 10, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
I propose merging Bunny Style! and Target (T-ara song) into this article. All three articles have almost no content beyond extensive track listings. Better to merge them and try to make one acceptable article instead of three terrible ones. Most songs fail song notability requirements, and per WP:SONGS, most songs should not have standalone articles. Please share your comments. Shinyang-i (talk) 05:35, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose. The songs are notable. The articles are not stubs and contain lots of useful information. The articles are expandable. If you redirect them, you will prevent people from expanding them. You will deny Wikipedia the opportunity to grow. --Moscow Connection (talk) 13:39, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The articles have like three lines of prose. The rest is tables of statistics and track listings. They are definitely stubs and don't contain any information at all about the songs as actual pieces of music, which is what a song information is supposed to be about. I'm begging you at this point to please, please go read some of the Wikipedia guidelines and requirements for song notability and song articles in general and why every single ever released should not have its own article! (I wish you'd also kill that silly assertion that you've posted on every merge proposal about me denying Wikipedia the opportunity to grow. Really, dude, come on.) Shinyang-i (talk) 16:32, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. All three articles are extremely short, and note that WikiProject Songs says "A separate article is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article". 2 of the 3 articles also have no references whatsoever. Random86 (talk) 01:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose.The song stand on its own as a single release. The song also achieved several nominations and charts which is different from the full album. The full album also does not contains song which only released on this single. Roslee78 (talk) 08:34, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The tour article is nothing more than a list of tour dates and a set list, and does not appear to meet WP:NTOUR. Some of this could possibly be merged to the album article. Random86 (talk) 01:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
