Talk:Tommy and Tuppence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I replaced the link and the phrase with "young adults," as the Stephen Fry movie has no connection to this novel. | Klaw Talk 02:12, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The film's title is a reference to a specific type of person in the 1920s and 30s, which Tommy and Tuppence fit quite well. Not that that's a reason to link to it, but the person who added that bit probably didn't check where the link went. Daibhid C 15:22, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tommy and Tuppence.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Tommy and Tuppence.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 20 May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Tommy and Tuppence.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:19, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on article[edit]

Not sure why Albert is described as their "hapless" assistant. A kind of ruefulness is part of the style of the Tommy & Tuppence stories, but Albert seems to me rather capable.

I would love to see a revised edition of "Postern of Fate" that saved the good things in it, and reduced the incoherence. The thought of some new reader picking up this title and thinking it represented A.C.'s output is heartsinking.

Rogersansom (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:49, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tommy and Tuppence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:50, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Portrayed By[edit]

The 'Portrayed by' details in the sidebar at the top are wrong - what is correct is the information listed in 'Adaptations'. I don't know how to edit the sidebar. 92.233.17.56 (talk) 11:36, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]