This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
I propose removing the COI tag. A major contribution by the self-admitted subject of the article does not seem apparent. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"I am Tom Laidlaw. Someone is continually writing negative comments about me on my page. I have edited them in the past. I tried to edit some comments today but it appears I can't because I am not the administrator." So apparently sometimes the subject has been editing as an IP or under some other name. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:16, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Sorry didn't see this discussion but I just removed the tag. I had a look through the history and someone has indeed been adding unsourced negative information, from what I can see from the history it looks like the subject's edits have been to remove this. January(talk) 19:22, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
He's still got a bad ownership problem here. I believe the tag should stay. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:31, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
He says all he's done is edit negative comments. I have had a look through the history and the only negative infomation that has ever been added to this article has been unsourced. All he seems to have done is revert BLP violations. WP:COI#Non-controversial edits lists deleting content that violates Wikipedia's BLP policy, so he hasn't breached WP:COI. January(talk) 19:45, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Punishing the subject with a COI tag for what looks like twice removing unsourced negative content seems like a gross overreaction to me. It is us who have failed the subject by allowing such material to remain so long in the first place. I am removing the tag, and will continue to do so unless someone shows me some clear evidence of the supposed ownership issue. Kevin (talk) 06:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay; but keep an eye on it. If he starts removing sourced negative information, I'll be able to say "I told you so"; if nothing of the sort happens, then you'll clearly have been right and I wrong. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There is an inconsistency in the statistics: The table states that Laidlaw scored 4 goals in playoffs across his career. However, if you add them all up, it is 5 goals.
