Talk:To Be Kind

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Steve Albini[edit]

I notice that an IP editor keeps adding Steve Albini as a producer for this album. I'm looking at the credits in the booklet of the album as I type and can't see his name anywhere. Good work to those who've removed this and something to keep an eye on incase it gets re-added. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 18:14, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

10 reviews[edit]

For the reception section. I count 11 in the summary box. Which one should be removed? musicOMH? Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 19:56, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Useful source[edit]

Interview http://pitchfork.com/features/interviews/9400-swans/ I don't have time to add this to the article now but someone should. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:05, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment for my most recent edit[edit]

koavf, why didn't you just add the album as a source then? I'm adding it multiple times for every seperate track listing/every seperate track listing template. A reader could assume only the first one was sourced if I didn't. Also, the live tracks are only included in a deluxe version of the album, there's no need for it to be non-collapsed. Littlecarmen (talk) 17:56, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Littlecarmen: You don't need to cite things like "X book has three chapters" or the track listing of an album: the source is the work itself. By this logic, don't we need to provide a citation that the citation says this? And a citation for that, too? If you want to know the track listing of To Be Kind, just check the album itself. Unless there's some weird controversy about the track listing (e.g. different editions have different songs), then there's nothing to be cited. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:55, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cites needed for the tracklisting were added with this edit, which was made one day before the album was released, so I can understand the need to cite that. I guess it's the same situation as casts for film articles - they don't need citing, unless there's a question mark over a cameo or role title. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 09:14, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Needle Drop[edit]

I see someone keeps adding this review into the reception section. Looking at the article, I'm struggling to see if indeed it's actually notable enough to have its own article on WP. Thoughts? Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:16, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

While I also believe that his reviews aren't notable for inclusion in the infobox (there were some discussion related to this somewhere on WP), the blog (or Anthony Fantano) seems fairly notable in my opinion. Nevertheless, I also think that the talk page of To Be Kind is not the most appropriate place to discuss the notability of the article. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 15:41, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

07/26/2014

Apologies for the format, I don't know how to use Wikipedia. I made the edit yesterday to add The Needle Drop's review to the reception section because the reviewer gave the album a 10/10, which is notable because it is the second time in his reviewing history that he gave an album a perfect score. The Needle Drop (https://www.youtube.com/user/theneedledrop/) has 319,497 subscribers and 55,807,407 views on YouTube, making the channel the most popular music critic on the site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.120.120.155 (talk) 04:47, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]