This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Accreditation citations in biographical articles[edit]
I certainly have no sympathy for unaccredited, religious schools, but Rossnixon suggested, I believe, that the accreditation status of an institution claimed or cited as included in the educational experience of a biographical article can be obtained by reading the linked-to article. I think that's a good point and I agree. It doesn't seem useful and, indeed, it seems to clutter articles, if we list every unaccredited institution as such in articles about evangelicals. Christians, especially, have created some sort of cottage industry when it comes to creating unaccredited religious schools that are really just degree mills of some sort. The more I read these articles at Wikipedia, the more convinced I am that making a point of this issue over and over again is completely unnecessary, especially when we can go to the institution's page at Wikipedia and read that for ourselves. - Nascentatheist 04:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have access to this journal, but apparently Raymond O. Zorn reviewed Dominion Theology: Blessing or Curse? in the November 1989 issue of Vox Reformata (pages 52–54). gnu57 05:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
