This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Wikispecies currently cites 117 taxa described by Deuve, so he is probably noteworthy. DGtal (talk) 23:49, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Now that the article has specified that Deuvia is named after him, and that this talk page (but not yet the article) states that he authored over 100 taxa, I am utterly convinced he meets our notability guidelines. In fact, I'd wondered which idiot might have suggested he wasn't notable in the first place. But then spotted I'd put the tag on there myself! I am delighted to now remove it. But please help reviewing editors to appreciate notability by putting salient points into a new article right from the outset, please. It saves a lot of time and heartache. Nick Moyes (talk) 08:25, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
