Talk:Thielert Centurion

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thielert Centurion article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Aviation: Engines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Less marketing speak[edit]

The article was informative but was too glowingly fulsome in its praise. Re-write and expansion in progress. Paul Beardsell 14:02, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert original research[edit]

Sorry, very interesting, but as per WP:V rules the following "original research" has been culled from the article.

I personally fly a retrofitted Cessna 172SP. It has been converted over to the 1.7litre engine. The three greatest things about the conversion is that there is no dealing with mixture and rpm setting, it is done automatically by a push of the lever. The other great thing is the runup...There is none. You simply press the runup button and the system does a FADEC check. Lastly who loves economic engines...you won't find anything more economic than this engine. At crusie you burn approximately 6.7gph.

The draw backs now: the engine weights more therefore reducing payload and the max fuel on board. The plane climbs like you have a elephant being dragged behind, it cannot climb rapidly. Early morning/cold weather starts...forget about it. Even if you follow the startup checklist to the T, chances are you will recieve an AED light if not a FADEC light. They say after two minutes of idle if everything isnt in the green increase the rpm to 1400. If you follow these directons you will throw the AED light. The plane cannot do power on stalls, you will once again throw an AED light. WHen trying to rapidly descend the checklist to not do it less than 30% of the engines load, even slightly above thise somehow you can manage to overrev the airplane(RPM red light comes on)as well as the core temp of the engine dropping into the yellow.

Overall I'd stay away from this conversion because although it is simpler to use, it has many problems associated with it as well. Best stay with the original motor until the bugs are furthur out of the system. Here is an example of a diesel in the NTSB already, NTSB Identification: MIA07IA067.

Paul Beardsell 07:08, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bank angle of various models[edit]

While the bank angle of the Centurion 4.0 is specified, what is the bank angle of the Centurion 3.0? What is the number of cylinders and bank angle of the Centurion 3.2? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scarlet Eagle (talk • contribs)