Talk:Theatrical smoke and fog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconStagecraft C‑class (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Stagecraft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.StagecraftWikipedia:WikiProject StagecraftTemplate:WikiProject StagecraftStagecraft articles
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2019 and 8 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Sourjax.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Effects[edit]

I recognize that in certain situations, digital effects are desirable over practical fog for health reasons, but always in the case of live theatre, and often in the case of film and television as well, digital isn't practical or possible. Absolute statements about using only CG and filters doesn't really serve anyone. DJSparky (talk) 06:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nitrogen heavier than air[edit]

I removed the phrase in the Adverse Health Effects section about nitrogen being heavier than air. Air consists primarily of nitrogen (78%) and oxygen (21%), and oxygen is actually heavier (32 amu vs. 28 amu). However, it is true that at high enough concentrations (especially indoors) it's possible for it to displace enough oxygen to cause asphyxiation, so I left the rest of the section as it was. Jevav (talk) 20:20, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nitrogen evaporated from liquid is "heavy" of course, because it is cold! At - 178° C, (boiling point), the density is more than double of the density at room temperature. If such gas collects in a narrow low lying space (a cellar, or below stage in the orchestra "ditch"), asphyxiation can occur. Its just like carbon dioxide in cellars where wine or beer is fermenting.

References[edit]

I'm planning on removing the "This Article does not cite and sources or references" tag because frankly, it does, and is significantly larger and more in-depth than when it was originally tagged. Could it still be improved? yes, especially the history section, but it's still coming along nicely. DJSparky (talk) 00:04, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History section[edit]

The history section is very small, only one sentence. Can this be expanded? 193.141.37.130 (talk) 13:27, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Liquid Air[edit]

Although Liquid Air certainly sounds like a viable replacement for Liquid Nitrogen, I've not yet seen this in the industry, and the only references I could find on the web are copies of this wikipedia article on various other sites. Can someone find a reliable reference for this use of liquid air? GothicAwakening (talk) 03:38, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Liquid sysnthetic air[edit]

This section is absolute nonsense. Synthetic air (made by mixing purified oxygen and nitrogen) is very expensive and is used for very special purpose in analytic apparatus (eg. flame ionisation detectors) This air is sold as pressure gas in cylinders, never as a liquid. Because liquid air has some risks in handling (fire, explosion when mixed with certain combustibles) nobody will use it on stage, neither "standard" and absolutely not "synthetic". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.221.250.252 (talk) 12:31, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removed that section, I can't find any evidence of 'Liquid Air' ever having been used for stage-smoke effects. GothicAwakening (talk) 08:00, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Theatrical smoke and fog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Theatrical smoke and fog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Theatrical smoke and fog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Theatrical_smoke_and_fog&oldid=1066233073"