This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
A fact from The Wolf of Wall Street (2013 film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2014, when it received 7,273,498 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report8 times. The weeks in which this happened:
Proposed additions and reorganization of the article[edit]
While the most superficial information about this film regarding its plot is relatively strong, the film has grown to become increasingly controversial and thus this article is in need of some new additions and reorganization. I am proposing adding a "controversy" subsection under the reception section and reorganizing the various controversies scattered throughout this article into the new "controversy" section. This article is also lacking in recent news and has no mention of the academic discussion surrounding the articles portrayal of characters and more nuanced themes. I am proposing adding such a section which discusses the wide array of opinions about the core controversial themes to this film. The subsection I propose will include this academic discussion of the films controversial themes, the latter half regarding PETA in the use of animals subsection under production, a brief mention of the films excessive profanity, Margot Robbie's recount of filming a sexual scene, and any more I come across in my research.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 11:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Much better. Less wordy and technical. Review as follows: Date, length and ALT hook all OK. QPQ done, no close paraphrasing. Pic licence fine but probably doesn't work with the ALT. ALT3 Good to go. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 13:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
_(cropped).jpg)
Much better. Less wordy and technical. Review as follows: Date, length and ALT hook all OK. QPQ done, no close paraphrasing. Pic licence fine but probably doesn't work with the ALT. ALT3 Good to go. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 13:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)