Talk:The War of the Worlds (1953 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Science Fiction Start‑class High‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Library of Congress Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Plot[edit]

The "Plot" section mainly discusses special effects and differences between the book and the movie, not the plot itself.

The same problem exists on the novel's synopsis, where the machines and weapons are talked about mostly, rather than the actual story. Of course, if the plot of the book is improved on its article, then there won't really be much of a need for a synopsis in the film. Scorpionman 15:28, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And there seems to be a bit of POV within the text. I did some work by removing trivia section so as to give a place to integrate two of the effects into the article more structually. Som film articles are too narrow to avoid this, but this film has enough behind it to avoid a trivia section, I feel. But I should note that I kind of got stumpped on how to write the effects secrets into it, so I hid it, and hope someone will do it in the future.

I also agree that the article puts too much focus on the differences between the film and its source material. There is no mention of the colourful history behind the film such as adaptation issues (which involved Cecil B. DeMille, Alfred Hitchcock, and Ray Harryhausen), as well as Pál's attempt to get a TV series started. --Bacteria 19:23, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

fun facts?[edit]

Some of the trivia seemed odd to me based on what is contained in the commentary on the latest DVD release. For example, the martian sound effects were done with an electric guitar. A woman screaming backwards would sound...almost exactly like a woman screaming forwards! Markmtl 08:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the person who added most of the trivia took it from IMDb (which claims that the invisible legs are only present in the beginning of the film, though you can see them as late as the climax just before they go down). I removed the bits (see above) and tried to splice it into the rest to make it a better worked article, but I kind of got lost in trying to figure out how to put them in without making it a simple list, which should always be avoided in these articles. Part of this that I got confused about something: is the electric guitar thing related just to the humming, or does it include the Heat-Ray firing, which is what I would think sounds the most like a guitar. --Bacteria 19:23, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The heat-ray firing sounds nothing like a guitar, maybe when it is getting ready to fire. I saw the movie on TV and they had an introduction where they said the heat-ray was the recording of a woman screaming played backwards. One more thing, I believe a guitar can just faintly be heard when the heat-ray is fired, behind the high-pitch screeching.- JustPhil 12:53, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The DVD commentary also mentions electric guitar. There's the thrumming noise before the firing of the heat ray weapon and then the "NEEH-NEEH-NEEH-NEEH-NOWWW" screechy sound with the falling pitch at the end. I'm a sometime guitarist and it seems to me that whereas the electric guitar tech of 1953 could have made the thrumming noise, the screeching sound of the heat ray firing is plausible but only with technique that would have been extremely avant-garde for the day. I visualize a two-fingered right-hand repeated tapping technique on two strings at once, ending with a slide down the neck while dampening the strings near the nut with the left hand. I wish I could locate a definitive description of the sound effects creation. 66.56.69.6 (talk) 03:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Alien01.jpg[edit]

Image:Alien01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"H. G. Wells' War of the Worlds (film)"[edit]

The usage and primary topic of H. G. Wells' War of the Worlds (film) is under discussion, see Talk:H. G. Wells' War of the Worlds (2005 film) -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 08:41, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:H. G. Wells' War of the Worlds (2005 film) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 08:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. There is consensus to not move this page. (non-admin closure). Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– No need to disambiguate by using the years. 2A02:C7D:564B:D300:F982:AF26:A63C:B753 (talk) 11:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:SMALLDETAILS as there are other films at The War of the Worlds (disambiguation). I wouldn't know which films would be prefixed with "H. G. Wells' The..." or "H. G. Wells'..." and the two suggested targets should redirect to the disambig page (if they don't already do so). Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose as a bit fussy. The year helps a bit with the natural disambiguation. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 00:54, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Removal Of Uncredited Actors / Case for Ann Codee[edit]

Have visited War of the Worlds page many times, but on my latest visit (June 3 2018) I see that the names of several uncredited actors were removed from the CAST section.

On the one hand, this seems reasonable as many parts were very brief one-time on-screen appearances. However, there's at least one actor who appears more than once, and contributes to the story. This is Ann Codee who played Pacific Tech Biologist Dr. Dupree. In her first appearance onscreen, she confirms the fragile nature of the Martian blood. In her second appearance, she is with Forrester, Sylvia, General Mann and the other Pacific Tech scientists during the attempted atomic bombing of the Martian machines. In her third and final appearance, she and Bilderbeck (Sandro Gilgio) are found by Forrester in a church.

At least give some consideration for Miss Codee!

Thanx-A-Lot, Fgf2007 (talk) 20:53, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uncredited cast members need a reliable source discussing their appearance in the film. That's pretty much all it takes. DonIago (talk) 03:17, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier black and white film?[edit]

I have a recollection of an older film which was in black and white and was more true to the original plot compared to this version.. does anyone else recall this or have more details? 60.242.175.237 (talk) 07:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Both The War of the Worlds and List of works based on The War of the Worlds state (or imply) that this is the first film adaptation, though without sourcing. Wells' IMDb credits support this claim. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:War of the Worlds (2005 film) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Doctor Clayton Forrester (The War of the Worlds)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Doctor Clayton Forrester (The War of the Worlds) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 19 § Doctor Clayton Forrester (The War of the Worlds) until a consensus is reached. Dronebogus (talk) 13:14, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]