This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Per Template:Infobox_film#Image, we use the original theatrical release for posters. In this case, it's South Korea. For a similar discussion on this topic that went down, you can see it here. I'm happy to discuss it either way though! Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to argue this, though I think a poster from the English-speaking world should be used on English Wikipedia. Regardless, the poster should be uploaded in the original namespace. I've done this. — Film Fan 00:39, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. I understand the value of that, but I'm going to go with what the WP:FILMS project stands by for now. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:45, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've replaced the genre back to horror film, as the article doesn't have enough context to suggest it's part of other genres or not, and that by linking horror thriller film as it was before, just re-directs to horror film anyway, which goes against WP:EGG. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:45, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On second notice, a lot of titles in the article use thriller, but I'll wait until we come to a conclusion. The article needs to be expanded anyways I guess before we go into this kind of nit-picking. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just to clear the air. I didn't revert any particular part of the article's content. I reverted a user. The user was permanently blocked. I reverted many of his edits on many different pages. If his edit is correct, feel free to put it back.
However, typically, it is written as two separate words with two separate links, horror and thriller. Why the original was written as a piped link is not for me to say. I just reverted edits made by a blocked vandal.
