This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
The Victorian Society covers a different period so the detachment afforded by a link in the See Also section seems to me to be entirely appropriate. The only reason for such a link in the article is to help a reader interested in more than that covered by the 20CS. In any case the sentance added doesn't make sense and given the above, I've no interest in making it so. The Lloyds link is a high profile example of the societies work. -- John (Daytona2 ·Talk ·Contribs) 12:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree and note the following:
By saying "see also" the article is disjointed and fails to mention what The Victorian Society does. This is removing important information from the article for no reason.
I put the link into Lloyd's Building because it is relevant there, but not so relevant here. (but this is less important than point 1) Tony May (talk) 18:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Society for the Preservation of Ugly Buildings[edit]
This organisation should give itself an more accurate name, such as the above. The current name doesn't even indicate which field of endeavour it is concerned with (20th Century knitting? Mass murder? Literature?) Alex Middleton (talk) 02:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How about we start a "Campaign against the Twentieth Century Society"? The valuable work is to seek the demolition of as much 20th century architecture as quickly as possible, not its demolition. Luwilt (talk) 01:44, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
