Talk:The Trial of Davros

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Trial of Davros article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Doctor Who Low‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 August 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Trial of Davros. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Trial of Davros at the Reference desk.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Proposed article deletion[edit]

Jezhotwells has proposed that this article, ‘The Trial of Davros’, be deleted for the reason “Non notable amateur play, can find no RS to establish notability”. I have removed the deletion message for the following reasons:

The proposer has failed to take any account or make mention of a notability rationale contained within the article itself.
At the time of writing there are 17 Wikipedia pages linked to the article, not including pages associated with the deletion proposal notification.
At the time of writing Googling “The Trial of Davros” produces 59,700 results.
It appears that the proposer has unreasonably attempted to add weight to their deletion proposal by inserting an 'unreferenced' tag in the article at the same time as the 'notability' tag, when in fact the article history shows that it has contained references since its creation in December 2010.
It appears that the proposer has unreasonably attempted to add weight to their deletion proposal in that immediately after inserting the 'notability' and 'unreferenced' tags in the article they edited the article’s Discussion Page by inserting a 'WikiProject Theatre' assessment template, indicating class=stub, importance=low.
Notability in Wikipedia must satisfy the requirements of significant coverage, reliable secondary sources and independence of the subject. Proving significant coverage meeting the required criteria would be time consuming, but a reasonable presumption that this is the case may be extrapolated from the following examples.

[1][2][3] [4][5][6]

If the proposer or anyone else feels that Wikipedia will be improved by the deletion of this article rather than its retention then, as its author, I consider it would be appropriate for me to recuse myself from further discussion and to let the matter be decided by consensus at AfD. Thanks for your time. Donlock (talk) 22:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]