Talk:The Tempest (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Tempest (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 7, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Tempest (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 15:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

yes.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    How reliable is thuglifearmy (This is a fan based site...)?
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • Dabsolver check: one dab solved (unlinked "giant" as common word)
  • Checklinks check: ok

Assessment[edit]

This article doesn't even meet "C" class criteria for the album Wikiproject. To meet "C" class, an album article needs a list of performers. To met "B" class, it needs a list of performers and technical personnel. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Assessment. This would meet the "start" class assessment of that project. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]