Talk:The Savage Rose

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I am a BIG Savage Rose fan, and I do not believe that they may be categorized as "psychedelic," although certainly some of their music may. Please listen to a broader range of their music.Cospelero (talk) 18:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Savage Rose have their own unique sound but thropugh the years they have been folk, rock, soul, gospel, classical etc. Today they should be classified as soul , in 67 as psychedelic, in the 80s as folk . train2train

Cristgau's hateful and uninformed review needs to go[edit]

While Cristgau may be a key reviewer in US 70s counterculture, the review pasted into this article about a long lasting non-English European band is such a pile of uninformed spiteful personal attacks based on only one early album that it shouldn't be elevated to be the final word about 50 years as an iconic voice in political music. 77.213.212.241 (talk) 16:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]