This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The SWORD Project article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
The contents of the Eloquent page were merged into The SWORD Project. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (12 January 2017)
Proposal to merge Eloquent into The SWORD Project[edit]
This article has an extensive list of frontends that make use of the SWORD project, but are not themselves part of the SWORD project. Many of these are either unsourced, or there only sources are selfpublished (or press release type repostings, which is as good as selfpublished). Should we really be listing all of these here? If so, should we pare this down to only sourced the entries with independent sourcing? Should we use a more compact way to display these, such as a table?
My personal preference would be to remove all the stuff without independent sourcing and compress what is left (if that is anything) into a table or a bulleted list. - MrOllie (talk) 20:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Id prefer to leave it as it is, the STEPBible entry was merged here after an AFD discussion and that might be the case for some of the other entries. The participants in that AFD felt this was a suitable place for the applications. Also, your edit warring to remove the links instead of discussing it was not collegiate, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:14, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Even the completely unsourced ones?
As to the external links, your revert seemed to be based on a clear misunderstanding of the guideline about official sites. If you feel strongly that the links should be retained, I could go somewhere like WP:ELN for more opinions. - MrOllie (talk) 11:40, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done