This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Notre Dame, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of University of Notre Dame on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Notre DameWikipedia:WikiProject Notre DameTemplate:WikiProject Notre DameNotre Dame articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The first sentence emphasizes how the paper is "award-winning" and the page only contains positive coverage of The Observer's reporting. It has been that way since at least August, and it appears to be highly likely that this was a copy-and-paste move, as the page was created with a note that it contains too many primary sources that was dated 18 months prior to the page's creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikehawk10 (talk • contribs) 18:28, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that it should be changed. But it does not mean that it should be deleted. If the Indiana Daily Student, The_Ball_State_Daily_News, The Communicator (IPFW), The DePauw, Purdue Exponent pass muster, why shouldn't Notre Dame paper too? It has more secondary references than the average campus newspaper too. It may meet the criteria for deletion, but it definitely does not meet the criteria for a speedy deletion (WP:SPEEDY). Eccekevin (talk) 21:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
