Talk:The Mama Who Came to Dinner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Mama Who Came to Dinner/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Soaper1234 (talk · contribs) 13:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I plan on reviewing this article. It is my first GA review, so do bear with me. Expect comments in the coming days. Soaper1234 - talk 13:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have responded to all your comments, so I am happy to give this article a pass. Well done! Soaper1234 - talk 14:11, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

  • All looks fine to me.

Synopsis[edit]

Production[edit]

  • Do you have a source for the director, writers and producers?
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Clarify who Judy Winslow is as she has not been mentioned anywhere so far.
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

  • Are the years for the different shows necessary?
 Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unlink Family Matters
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove "("What a Wonderful World" by Louis Armstrong)" - second mention of theme song so no need to clarify.
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "and to turn off their TVs after the song concluded" → "and then turn their television off".
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

  • Change |author= in references to |first= |last=.
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Reference #4 still needs changing. This can be done using |first1= |last1= |first2= |last2=. Soaper1234 - talk 10:10, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Soaper1234: The issue has been fixed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress[edit]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Notes[edit]