Talk:The Long Blondes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Untitled[edit]

Are those the real names of the band? surely not

Picture?[edit]

Surely someone has a fairly high quility gig photo they can put in. --Nathan (Talk) 23:55, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


do they have "lesbian lyrics"?

userbox[edit]

LBsThis user will never take you to giddy stratospheres, I'll confirm your fears.




{{User:UBX/Long_Blondes}}
I just made a Long Blondes userbox. Enjoy --Bobyllib 14:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Someone To Drive You Home.jpg[edit]

Image:Someone To Drive You Home.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC

Long Blondes picture[edit]

Moved here from User talk:Trialsanderrors

I'm not convinced that the live pic you put up is suitable, you refer to Fair Use article point 17, which doesn't exist. I don't disagree that a live pic could be ok, but i don't think thats the one to use. I do however think that the promo pic was more suitable, as their look is such a key part of their appeal (see also the fact they have a section entitled Style on their page). Favouritesky 10:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry #17 was the wrong number. #12 is about live groups: Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. However, for some retired or disbanded groups, or retired individuals whose notability rests in part on their earlier visual appearance, a new picture may not serve the same purpose as an image taken during their career. Generally, we just keep looking for better free alternatives (you can also write Flickr users if they're willing to make their pictures available under a free license), but for active bands we never use non-free images. ~ trialsanderrors 16:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Presumably the band or Rough Trade could be presumed upon to give permission for the promo shot?Wwwhatsup 04:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's a possible solution, as long it's a free license (CC-BY or CC-BY-SA) and not just an permission to use it on Wikipedia. ~ trialsanderrors 19:22, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Discography[edit]

Sadly, under current Wikipedia non-free content policy, gallery style discographies are no go. The Couples pic has already been give a fair-use tag, so it's just a matter of time before it gets removed. The Discography should be reformatted into a table. Wwwhatsup (talk) 08:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

Removed from article per WP:EL:

but could be used as references to improve the article. TheJazzDalek (talk) 13:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on The Long Blondes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:30, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on The Long Blondes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]