Talk:The Incredible Hulk (1994 video game)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 07:10, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

  • "created by a pair of" by two.
  • "one-and-a-half years" 18 months is a bit tighter.
  • "and enemy variety" lack of?
  • "The Incredible Hulk is fighting" He's just referred to as "The Hulk" throughout.
  • "side-scrolling" etc, relink in the main body.
  • "influence the amount of moves" "amount of" adds nothing.
  • "shots,[4] and cannot" and who cannot.
  • the "Hulk is too large " reason for transforming to Banner appears not to be covered in the Gameplay section.
  • "Abomination, and" overlinked.
  • "Tyrannus' underground" Tyrannus's
  • "has The Leader scoffing" the
  • "but The Hulk retaliates" the Hulk.
  • "rubble at The Leader's escape" the Leader's
  • "Mean Machines" link in body.
  • "However, Marvel Comics objected" link here too.
  • Link platforms here too.
  • "Computer & Video Games " Computer and Video Games
  • Check later instance of C&VG too.
  • "chart at #7 the following" number 7, avoid hash for "number".
  • A couple more of these follow.
  • " at Blockbuster Video in its" overlinked.
  • "Mega placed the game at #39 " overlinked and hash abuse.
  • Notes a, b and c appear to just be references???

That's it from me. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:27, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All points have been addressed except for the very last; it's a valid measure in order to keep clusters of references from affecting the readability of the prose, per WP:CITEMERGE. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 19:38, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Can you not just WP:CITEBUNDLE the references? I've honestly never seen this way of collating the references into textless footnotes... The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've used this particular format in a number of past GAs (ex: 1, 2, 3) without any comment, and at least one other has done it as well, so I would think that it's acceptable. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 20:27, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I've never seen this before and find it very confusing, like the notes are missing. But it's not part of the GA criteria, so I'll have to let it go. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 11:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]