Talk:The Harvard Review of Philosophy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Philosophy: Literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature

Proposed Merger to Harvard University[edit]

Oppose merger On 20 August 2009 Falcon8765 proposed merging this article into the Harvard University article without comment. As the Harvard University article does not currently have a /* Publications */ section, I think that merger would be premature. This is currently a stub, but it does need to be expanded, and it rates more than a single line entry in the large Harvard University article. --Bejnar (talk) 22:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merger--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 09:58, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merger, removing the banner due to unanimity. JEN9841 (talk) 01:37, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

What is notability for an academic journal? Crusio has created a first draft of a notability guideline for academic journals. How would The Harvard Review of Philosophy stack up against that guideline? --Bejnar (talk) 04:32, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]