Talk:The Great Destroyer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Anyone have an image of the album cover? Eyeball kid 16:09, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>[edit]

  • All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 15:20, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Low The Great Destroyer.jpg[edit]

Image:Low The Great Destroyer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References, etc.[edit]

Just spent a while going through finding references for everything and cleaning up what was there already, as this page was a total mess, with templates etc everywhere. I commented out the Rolling Stone review as the link was dead - I think this is a problem with Rolling Stone moving things as I've seen this problem elsewhere but I can't find the review on their new site (or anything else Low-related for that matter), if anyone comes across it they're welcome to put it back with the correct link. FWIW, I don't think it's helpful to mark every single sentence as 'citation needed', nor put the 'barelink' template in - it takes a couple of seconds to run reflinks which would stop articles looking terrible. Onwards... Amkilpatrick (talk) 10:37, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]