Talk:The Devil Inside (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article needs A LOT of work[edit]

BreakingDexter (talk) 20:47, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just a word to the wise[edit]

It's okay really, but i think we should try not to take on too much at once. As in, try not to add too much information ahead of yourselves. All in good time. Rushing the article will just make it very messy. Its easier to make a good article by taking your time than fixing a messy one once it's done. Trafalk09 (talk) 20:09, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reception, first sentence[edit]

I'm trying to avoid an edit war, so I'm seeking consensus.

The first sentence of the reception initially read, "The film was not screened for critics, and has received overwhelmingly negative reviews."

It was then changed to, "The film was not screened for critics, and was panned by critics."

I changed it back to the original, but then it was changed again to the "panned" version and then eventually changed to, "The film was not screened for critics, and was subsequently universally panned."

1) It was not universally panned, as the reception section goes on to highlight a few positive reviews.

2) I think "panned" is less encyclopedic than the original version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.195.22.67 (talk) 13:09, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Worst movie ending of all time?....[edit]

The statement " worst movie ending of all time" is opionated and should be removed. I saw this movie and think the ending was one of the best endings I ever saw in a scary movie. The theme of the movie was about demon possessed people transfering their demons into one another, possessing each other.... So, the end is brilliant because the person watching it should feel like they are the next victim of demonic transition possession, due to everyone in the last scene becoming possessed and dying in the horrific car crash. Thank you 204.99.118.9 (talk) 22:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow so deep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.182.203 (talk) 12:23, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]