Talk:The Dead Man

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Dead Man article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Comics: British Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by British comics work group.

Images[edit]

Suggested images to accompany this [1] (gets my vote) or [2] (possibly too much of a spoiler) (Emperor 03:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Although the second one looks better, it definitely is too much of a spoiler, unless you put it at the bottom of the page. The first one is fine. Richard75 21:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Complete Case File[edit]

Could I please have an explanation for why my edit, listing the volume of the Complete Case Files in which this story appears, was reverted? Several other similar articles list this information, and I'm certain that the volume cited was correct. Euchrid (talk) 21:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Dead Man was not collected in the Case Files. The sequel, Tale of the Dead Man, was in Case Files volume 14, because it was a Judge Dredd story, but The Dead Man was not as it was a spin-off from the main series. Any article or other source which says that either story was in volume 13 is mistaken I'm afraid, Richard75 (talk) 22:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So much for being complete. Thanks for the response! Euchrid (talk) 22:57, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]