Talk:The Comsat Angels

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Genre[edit]

It is obvious that the genre that The Comsat Angels play is post-punk, not shoegaze (trust me, personally I have heard My Bloody Valentine, Kitchens of Distinction and Slowdive) and it is also incogruent calling them Shoegaze as the shoegaze movement would develop at the mid-80's to late 80's and the work of The Comsat Angels is older. References:

Also check a definition on AMG of Shoegaze:

The-15th (talk) 23:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose that Dream Command be merged into The Comsat Angels. Dream Command was only a brief name used by the band, not intended to be a separate act, and not extensive or relevant enough to have a separate article. danBLOO (talk) 15:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Should obviously be merged as it's the same band. --Michig (talk) 16:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Clearly just an alias. Same band. Greg Fasolino (talk) 19:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • So it's almost a year later. Looks like this was supported. Can we merge?Greg Fasolino (talk) 17:29, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Having two articles forks the band's history.
@Greg Fasolino: I say, go ahead. Narky Blert (talk) 13:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 05:16, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on The Comsat Angels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:18, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

There are 10 entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
  • ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
  • WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links. --
Trim links and remove 2013 tag.

Otr500 (talk) 02:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]