Talk:The Brady Bunch/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 12:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- I will do this review.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- At first glance, several things stand out.
- A lot of content without WP:ICs.
- A cast section that excludes the most important characters (and includes lots of parenthetical extraneous content for guest stars).
- Many short paragraphs (mostly uncited).
- Bare URLs
- Partially formatted citations.
- problems with both section of the toolbox on this page to the right (5 dead links and a circular redirect).
Due to the amount of uncited content (E.g. every bulletpoint in the "Specials, documentaries, and other revivals" section, all four paragraphs in the "DVD releases" section, and many other wholely uncited paragraphs) I am quickfailing this nomination.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- P.S. I wouldn't be surprised if the original show portion of the show didn't deserve to be expanded. If you don't count the stuff on all the sequels and specials, there is really not that much about the show here. Since you have full books as sources, I think there is probably more content out there.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:33, 7 March 2014 (UTC)