Talk:The Arrival (Fringe)

The Arrival (Fringe) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 3, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Arrival (Fringe)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 00:15, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
MOS is fine, but the prose in your plot summary needs some work. You'll want a comma after "New York", remove one in "he says, 'it has arrived'", take out the "a" in "he greets her with a 'Hello Liv'", and replace "advanced sort of stun gun" with "hi-tech", "futuristic" or just "advanced" - the "sort of" seems very informal. Also why does Peter need to be kept awake? This isn't explained in the article.

I made most of the changes you suggested (the plot was written by someone else, so I have that excuse!) And which part about Peter being kept awake is confusing? Sorry, I just don't see which part you are referring to. :) Ruby2010 talk 02:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
As usual, your referencing and citations are a-okay.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Scope is just as it should be.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Neutral.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Stable and uncontroversial.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Images are used well and are sourced correctly.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Going to stick this on hold until the first point above is seen to. I know you're a pretty prompt editor so this is probably going to be little more than a formality, but I'd rather not rubber-stamp a pass when it can shored up first.|Going to stick this on hold until the first point above is seen to. I know you're a pretty prompt editor so this is probably going to be little more than a formality, but I'd rather not rubber-stamp a pass when it can shored up first.

I'm happy with the improvements. Passed.

See my reply above :) Ruby2010 talk 02:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re-reading it, I think I misinterpreted what was meant in that sentence, so oops on my part. GRAPPLE X 11:13, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! Ruby2010 talk 14:57, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Arrival (Fringe). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110207204007/http://www.fox.com/fringe/recaps/season-1/episode-4 to http://www.fox.com/fringe/recaps/season-1/episode-4/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Arrival (Fringe). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]