Talk:The Armageddon Factor

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Doctor Who Mid‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

No Drax page?[edit]

Considering Drax seems to have popped up in a fair number of different stories in the expanded Whoniverse, I'm quite surprised that there is no page about him. This is most distressing, as I had hoped that of all the places that might know something of this Time Lord then Wikipedia would, since it has such a large set of Doctor Who articles. If I were more capable, I'd make one of my own, but I'm suggesting someone else should who is a proper editor of Wikipedia and knows how to do these things more smoothly/properly. It is very irksome to see Drax links in other pages constantly redirected here.--68.111.242.170 (talk) 09:36, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The main problem is one of verifiability. If reliable third-party sources discuss the significance of Drax the character in these other stories, there may be potential for such an article, or failing that, en extended section in this one; and such extra content on Drax would need to reference those sources. However, if you or I (or anybody else) were to read all the books, watch all the DVDs and listen to all the audio stories, from these make notes on Drax and then describe our findings in Wikipedia, this would count as original research, which is not permitted.

So, if you (or anybody else) know of suitable sources, begin by noting them here. Without those, there's not a lot we can do. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:37, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Armageddon Factor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]