Talk:The Adventures of Pluto Nash

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

It may have been a flop, but I enjoyed it. PrometheusX303 05:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If this film is the third-biggest flop of all-time, what about Michael Cimino's Heaven's Gate? -- Jalabi99 03:08, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did anyone else start thinking "The Producers" after watching this film? There is no way those special effects cost more than a couple of million, at most.Paganize (talk) 01:18, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Who was the uncredited Female Bodybuilder?[edit]

Rudy Soliman was the uncredited male bodybuilder, so who was the female bodybuilder that Rosario Dawson's head was imposed on?

Plot summary[edit]

Had a go at cutting this to a reasonable length. Haven't seen the movie, though. Adam Cuerden ^talk 02:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was still ridiculously long. I've trimmed it back to this earlier version. It should be easy enough to add a couple of sentences adding anything significant that has been omitted. --Tony Sidaway 18:01, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The summary was full of comma splices/run-on sentences. Periods or semicolons should used as well as be rearranged for brevity. I see that my corrected version was rolled back.71.75.24.92 (talk) 21:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)12.146.242.146 (talk) 01:51, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Varnado[edit]

"Actor Victor Varnado, who played the character Kelp in the film joked about its poor performance in an interview on podcast Keith and the Girl saying, "That is amazing because although it is the biggest money loser of all time for me it was the biggest money gainer!" Varnado was paid $110,000.^{[citation needed]} "

I am removing that quote from the article. If you wish to keep it on this wikipedia artcile please source it. Some might consider this libel, and without a source it could be entirely made up. I never heard of this anyway... - Prede (talk) 00:23, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pluto Trash?[edit]

A better name for the film? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.187.97 (talk) 23:29, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 16 2002[edit]

Never Forget.

Watched it[edit]

...expecting a disaster. It's not half-bad. There are certainly much worse movies around and the stylistic choice of a kitsch atmosphere blended quite well with everything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.121.67.128 (talk) 11:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leave the brilliantly bad summary alone![edit]

I haven't watched this movie, but I feel like I have because the movie summary was so appropriately awful. Don't change a thing in this article, it's perfect! __ø(._. ) Patrick("\(.:...:.)/")Fisher 18:55, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch[edit]

Flop for the ages is a pretty harsh description, but this film received many harsh descriptions and I am surprised so few are included in this article. This article is actually very favorable and I could argue WP:UNDUE undue weight has been given to positive commentary about this film. I'd try to update the article but the Reception section is minimal and it would take too long time to add both an expanded 'Box office' section as well as adding proper response from individual critics. I would encourage other editors talking about the various aspects of the film (far more important than box office discussions). TL;DR article needs work, improvements appreciated -- 109.78.24.155 (talk) 04:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Adventures of Pluto Nash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090928031715/http://www.rottentomatoes.com:80/guides/worst_of_the_worst/3/ to http://www.rottentomatoes.com/guides/worst_of_the_worst/3/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incredibly Amazing Trivia Feature[edit]

January 4th, 2017. While this movie is was made in 2000; it is about the future. An amazing coincidence is that both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are represented in this movie. Hillary, as supposedly the President's face on the money offered to Pluto Nash to sell his club; and Trump as the lunar Land Developer (logo shown on the drive scene from the city to the outpost). Obviously, they picked the wrong person on the money to represent the President. :P — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.6.214 (talk) 02:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rami Malek[edit]

Can anyone explain why "Rami Malek as Kester Moorhouse" has shown up on a number of Wikipedia pages in the cast section? See also: The Big Green, Tom and Huck, and Adventures of Tintin, among others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjmarsh84 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]