This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 6 August 2016, see discussion.
keep, 16 September 2008, see discussion.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Notability[edit]

1) A cursory internet search only returns an IMDB profile, and no other references.

2) The IMDB reference does not meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTFLLM

3) There is no full-length featured newspaper articles from large circulation newspapers or full-length magazine reviews and criticism reviewing the film.

4) The film is widely distributed, but it has not received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics.

5) The film is not historically notable.

6) The film was is not considered notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals. (Yes the five years has not passed, but really, do you think this film will be on any of thoise lists?)

7) The film has not bee featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema.

8) The film has not received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

9) The film has not been selected for preservation in a national archive.

10) As far as a internet search is concerned, the film is not "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program.

11) The film does not in any way, shape or form represent a unique accomplishment in cinema, a milestone in the development of film art, or contributes significantly to the development of United States cinema.

I beleive this film should be given a prod tag. It does not meet notability requirements of WP:NOTFLLM and should be nominated for deletion. Barton Foley (talk) 16:38, 12 September 2008 (UTC) Should be deleted. JEMZ1995 (talk) 00:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

==[edit]

I've removed the reception and references section. Three random reviews from an internet forum does not seem notable enough to appear in an encyclopedia. Let's wait for a professional review before we have a reception section. Benjaminlobato (talk) 19:11, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]