Talk:Texano Jr.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTexano Jr. has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 30, 2016Good article nomineeListed
January 26, 2017Good topic candidatePromoted
July 10, 2023Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 5, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that professional wrestler Juan Aguilar Leos was not revealed to be the son of El Texano until he was unmasked, after which he adopted the ring name "El Texano, Jr."?
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:El Texano Jr./GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  15:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "is a Mexican luchador, or professional wrestler" - translation should typically be in brackets, but feel free to ignore
    "who would later be known under the ring name Súper Nova" - what about Bengala?
    I've split a paragraph from the Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre (2003–2011) section, if that's OK
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Are you sure all of his signature moves can be sourced? (In ref 1?)
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

The prose is well written and the article is comprehensive, so I found no faults there. I wasn't sure if his signature moves were sourced (I couldn't access it), but I don't see how it would hinder the review, so I'll pass it outright. JAGUAR  19:01, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 7 October 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved  — Amakuru (talk) 23:33, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


El Texano Jr.Texano Jr. – I checked the sources, his ringname is Texano Jr., without El. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:30, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • His official twitter handle is @ElTexanoJr but the display name is "Texano Jr." Has he recently dropped the "El" from his stagename? Rreagan007 (talk) 20:06, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I checked some sources of the article, the reports call him Texano Jr. His archived and current profile is also Texano Jr. [1] [2] --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 20:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support: I attempted to close this as uncontroversial, under a non-admin closure, but move over redirect was not allowed in the way it usually is, because destination history has more than one item. It'll need an admin to do it. Kevin McE (talk) 16:17, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.