Talk:Terry Bollinger

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Removed almost all of the page[edit]

I will add more back when I have time.

Terry Bollinger 14:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what I'm supposed to do...[edit]

After the above note, I did not touch this page for over seven years ago. Back in 2006 I edited it down so that the one and only event mentioned was that I was the author of a DoD report on open source software. That report was, is, and continues to be a pretty significant event in open source history.

I recently received a polite auto-bot email indicating that someone -- I think a real human, not just a bot? -- wanted more biographical info or the page would be deleted. I figured out how to enter the required information, and went through two or three more warning flags to provide just enough solid information to clear the flags. I hoped and assumed that doing so was OK since it would in any case have been difficult information for anyone else to have added. And I really hoped I was finally done with it.

Of course, I was wrong: Now I have been flagged for editing my own page.

There was a time years ago when I genuinely loved adding non-obvious info on diverse topics to Wikipedia. That ended long ago. I'm now afraid to touch anything on any topic, let alone the page on me, so I gave up actively participating many years ago. I still find that sad.

In this case, I literally do not know what I am supposed to do.

Addendum the next day[edit]

Delusion23, from your history comments, was by any chance mainly my insertion of... "interwiki links?"... that caused you to flag me? I can assure you that I only added them because I was trying to figure out how to clear an earlier flag that complained I didn't have enough of... something... in the page metadata. I did not know what they do; I only wanted to fix a flag. You already fixed the metadata problem, so I can't do anything there.

I know your Wikipedia specialty is sports, but if you can take just a few minutes to go through my actual edits and why I did them, and my publication record at other sites, I think you will see I am serious that I was just responding to flags, and that my page exists for some non-trivial reasons. Is there something more I am supposed to do? If so, what? Clearing the flag myself would no doubt just cause yet another flag, right?

Terry Bollinger (talk) 19:00, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]