Talk:Terry Adams (musician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tone[edit]

The article reads like a fan hagiography, not a serious encyclopedic article. It is loaded with hyperbole, weasel words and unsourced opinion. It needs to be cleaned up. Surely there's enough published about NRBQ to properly fill in the article without gushing. Studerby (talk) 00:06, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it only took five years, but I have edited the article to bring it more inline with Wikipedia's policies regarding sourcing and promotion. The tone was entirely inappropriate for an encyclopedia and certainly did not meet the requirement for neutral phrasing.--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Terry Adams (musician)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

You've either been to an NRBQ show, and understand that the article on Terry Adams is dead on, or you haven't, in which case, you'll never understand! While that may fly in the face of proper journalistic editing technique, the subject defies categorization, as the article so aptly describes. Gar3131 (talk) 11:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 11:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 07:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)