Talk:Teresa Ghilarducci

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article quality[edit]

God, what a horrible article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.136.15.34 (talk) 19:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it was. How is it now that I've souped it up? -JohnAlbertRigali (talk) 06:22, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"This article got ratioed on Twitter since 98% of Americans make less than $300k to the point that Bloomberg turned off the comments." with a cite to Kyle Kulinski podcast. Seems too colloquial? Can that be cleaned up to reflect the criticism she faced in a more scholarly manner befitting this site?

What is the plan?[edit]

plans proposed in her most recent book which would allow mandatory participation in savings plan

What does "allow mandatory" mean here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.247.15.207 (talk) 12:04, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that "allow mandatory" should have been "mandate". -JohnAlbertRigali (talk) 06:22, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why does this page exists?[edit]

This is a wholly unremarkable scolar with the only notable accomplishment to date being a suggestion to let your dog die of cancer. 50.125.240.246 (talk) 06:37, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]