Talk:Tenoroon

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that one or more audio files of a musical instrument or component be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and included in this article to improve its quality by demonstrating the way it sounds or alters sound. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request.

Photo[edit]

This is a great article, well done to the editors. Anyone got a picture? It could do wiht one. Guy 13:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I own the original Wolf tenoroon which is referred to in the article. I've uploaded an image. Anybody with more Wikipedia-fu than I might find a way to make it smaller, or also to link to the rear view at Wolf-tenoroon-rear.jpeg. It would also be nice to see more description and some images of older instruments, particularly Savary, who made a surprising number. Groogle (talk) 02:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup needed[edit]

Article tagged for cleanup. It's basically good, nicely informative, but:

The introduction reads like an essay, not an encyclopedia article, and should be rewritten.
Throughout, there are problems with grammar, punctuation, confusing passages, and capitalization.
Then there is the question of whether this article should appear under the title 'Tenoroon' at all. More than just tenoroons are discussed here. I believe it would make more sense to move it (with some consequent revision) to a new Bassoon family article, to which Tenoroon could redirect.

-- Rsholmes 16:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I took out a lot of bad grammar and re-worded some stuff all around, but it definatly still needs work. I agree it is a fairly good article, and I didnt take out the essential facts. Whoever wrote this article did a nice job with thier research! Ageofe 15:47, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd sure like to know who the author for this article is. I was responsible for commissioning the first Wolf Tenoroon, which I still own. It has the serial number of 1. What's shown in the photo seems to be a simplified prototype as mine has a full Heckel system keywork. The Tenoroon project with Wolf was written up in the British Double Reed society journal around 1990. Richard J Moore (richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.146.14.239 (talk) 11:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]