This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
@Terageorge and Jayjg: Firstly, thanks to Terageorge for starting this article and making significant and well-sourced citations to exceptional content; and to Jayjg for your exceptional edits. There are a number of other unregistered editors who have made contributions to this article and I can only assume by their edits, that they have a close connection with the synagogue/conregation. However, the article contained, up until my edits of today, too much content that simply doesn't need to form part of Wikipedia. Please see WP:ISNOT for a broad overview of what should not be included in articles. To ensure that I simply didn't {{blank}} all unnecessary content (as I see it), I've retained the content in the body of the article, yet hidden it from view. As always, this is just my opinion. However, my opinion is offered in the context that I'm about 80% through reviewing every US synagogue/congregation article on WP, and adopting a standardised approach to style and content. I've previously completed all Canadian synagogues. In short, even as it stands after my edits of today, this article is {{very long}}, needs {{more citations}}, and has an unclear {{Citation style}}. I'm done with the article for now. However, I'm always happy to receive feedback on others' point of view. And please, if you have a WP:COI, declare it so that I can assess your comments in that light. Thanks and happy editing. Rangasyd (talk) 05:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good work. I'm satisfied with the edits. The article did get a big long, lol. Terageorge (talk) 19:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The edits seem fine to me. Terageorge really did all the work on this article. Jayjg(talk) 21:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but as a neutral editor, I disagree that the article is too long. The prose size of this article is only 2,400 words, which is actually far below the threshold (per WP:TOOBIG) where the article should be split due to size alone, let alone the threshold where a split should be considered. Perhaps this has too many unnecessary details, but {{too long}} is usually used on articles of 15,000+ words. I've removed the tag. – Epicgenius (talk) 19:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
