Talk:Taxation in ancient Rome

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:04, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Graearms (talk). Self-nominated at 01:20, 7 August 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Epicgenius (talk) 17:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Temin, Peter. The Roman Market Economy. Core Textbook ed. Princeton University Press, 2012. Project MUSE muse.jhu.edu/book/36509.
  2. ^ Finley, M. I. (1999). The Ancient Economy: Updated with a new foreword by Ian Morris. Ian Morris. ISBN 978-0-520-21946-5.
  3. ^ Ward-Perkins, Bryan (2006-07-12). The Fall of Rome: And the End of Civilization. OUP Oxford. p. 43. ISBN 978-0-19-162236-6.
  4. ^ Cahill, Thomas. How the Irish saved civilization: the untold story of Ireland's heroic role from the fall of Rome to the rise of medieval Europe. Anchor Books, Doubleday, 1996, p. 26.
  5. ^ Roman-taxes at unrv.com
  6. ^ Bagnall, Roger S. (1985). "Agricultural Productivity and Taxation in Later Roman Egypt". Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-). 115: 289–308. doi:10.2307/284204. ISSN 0360-5949. JSTOR 284204.
  7. ^ Heather, Peter (2006). The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians. Oxford University Press, USA. p. 14. ISBN 978-0-19-532541-6.

What the hell is this?[edit]

Did a libertarian "write" this? It's shoddy, badly sourced, ideological and Christ alone knows how it wound up on the front page. DublinDilettante (talk) 03:03, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I came to the talk page for the same reason. This article is a bunch of bullshit, with claims that simply defy belief. Calling it "neutral" despite clear ideological bias is just egregiously wrong. CAVincent (talk) 04:53, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]