Talk:Tadpole person

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 20 July 2023 by reviewer BuySomeApples (talk · contribs).

Arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Tadpole person vs. headfooter[edit]

I have moved this page from "Headfooters" to "Tadpole person" for two main reasons:

I am able to find significantly more references to "tadpole person/people/man/men" in the scholarly literature than "headfooter(s)/head-footer(s)".
"Tadpole person" seems to be used more frequently in the field of child psychology/development, while "headfooter" is used more frequently in the field of art history/criticism, and this article currently has more content on the former.

As such, I have also edited the article to use these terms in the contexts where they are most appropriate. Astaire (talk) 03:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense, I was going to bring up WP:PLURAL myself. Orchastrattor (talk) 06:05, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]