Talk:System Center Operations Manager

Microsoft Windows: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

MOM Documentation[edit]

Are their any current documents or training materials around MOM? Other than what Microsoft offers?

Pricing: is it free? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.211.107.162 (talk) 17:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

embrace and extend[edit]

As , this represents a classic "embrace and extend" manuever, where Microsoft takes over an industry-standard acronym, and through mindshare, attempts to become a dominant player for reasons unrelated to its technology.

"To many network..." ?? Who are they ?? Embrace and extend ?? Is this Wikipedia or a nerd forum?? There is no source, so please remove this paragraph.

151.21.161.59 (talk) 23:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of overview section[edit]

Should I create a general overview of the capabilities of OpsMgr, much like what exists for Nagios? The current SCOM page seems too general and vague for me. Pavleck (talk) 08:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. You don't get a true notion of what the suite does... You can vaguely infer it serves to monitor infrastructure, but there isn't much described about the features themselves in this article. Demf (talk) 15:28, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCode for ISBN numbers[edit]

It seems, that the code for the ISBN number of special books is broken. Can someone fix it? 188.220.19.39 (talk) 14:27, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've just corrected the ISBN references so that they work. Ayeupmeduck (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More broken pages[edit]

This page is erroneously being served up in the low-resolution Mobile version. This problem has been affecting an increasing numb of Wikipedia pages recently, with mobile versions being delivered to hi-res devices, especially tablet computers. It is close to unusable with low information density and much scrolling required.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.97.15 (talk • contribs) 07:59, July 22, 2014‎ (UTC)