Talk:Sutherland railway station

Australia: Sydney / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Sutherland railway station is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Number of services[edit]

By all means lets count the number of services and get it right in the article, but this edit, just either contradicts or repeats the info in the previous para. --Inas66 (talk) 03:05, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Does it really matter exactly how may services stop at a station? It changes every timetable revision and will get out of date very quickly.

MrHarper (talk) 03:57, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not listing the info at all is a completely valid thing to do, if that is the general consensus, I would support it. WP is not going to be a timetable site. But, if we are going to list it, then we may as well be specific and accurate. After all, saying there are 5-7 services per hour is going to need to be updated next time there is a timetable update the same as a few sentences outlining peak/off-peak suburban/interurban frequencies is going to be. --Inas66 (talk) 04:30, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]