Talk:Survivor Series (1992)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I am reviewing your article for GA and will be adding comments below. I am reading through the article and have copy edited a few things in order for it to make more sense to me. Hope you don't mind. If so, let me know. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments
  • "According to WWF storylines, Samoans have thick skulls" - what does Samoans mean in this context?
  • I am struggling with all the names and plots but I guess there is no way to make that easier for the reader!

Mattisse (Talk) 22:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Samoans" just refers to people from Samoa. However, I can see that, since I didn't clarify that The Headshrinkers are from Samoa (and since their manager used to be part of a tag team names The Samoans), it wouldn't make a lot of sense without clarification. Does it work now? GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:30, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is there a simple explanation for what "tag in" means?
  • Also, in the beginning of the article, you regularly say "the Bossman", but I notice as you get into describing the matches you call him "Bossman".
  • Is there a definition of "buyrate"?

Mattisse (Talk) 23:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The few issues I raise above, I know you will take care of appropriately and they don not prevent this article from passing as a GA. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Very well written b (MoS): Follows MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Necessary statements are referenced b (citations to reliable sources): The references are to reliable sources. c (OR): There is no OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Sets the context b (focused): Remains focused on article subject
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Congradulations! Another GA for you!

Mattisse (Talk) 00:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]