Talk:Surval Montreux

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 July 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Switzerland

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Deletion discussoin[edit]

I am suggesting this article is removed as it contains some inaccuracies about the school and as such cannot be deemed helpful to users who are looking for relevant and objective information about Surval. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikilady2345 (talk • contribs) 07:34, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On the basis of WP:DUCK, Wikilady2345 appears to be another of the long list of CoI editors (such as the banned User:Wikijan2016, User:LisaHav, User:UserName22 to name only contributors to this page) on subjects related to Bellevue Education. It seems that this article, having had its puffery and advertising stripped out, and including a small amount of genuinely encyclopedic material, is no longer seen as helpful by its originators. On the specific subject of whether to delete it, my feelings are:

Weak keep; there is a very small amount of relevant and referenceable stuff in here. Although I doubt if the encyclopedia will be significantly weakened by deletion and I wouldn't bother to argue against any non-COI editor who wants to delete. Hunc (talk) 09:09, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't continue the deletion discussion here. It belongs at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surval Montreux instead. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:52, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]