Talk:Suriname at the 2008 Summer Olympics

Suriname at the 2008 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 25, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South America: Suriname Low‑importance

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Suriname (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Suriname at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 22:32, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):
b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Infobox[edit]

No issues

Lead[edit]

No issues

Background[edit]

No issues

Athletics[edit]

No isssues

Swimming[edit]

No issues

References[edit]

Reference 2 → "UF Athletics" should not be wiki-linked
Reference 4 → "Beijing 2008" should not be italicized; "ESPN" should be wiki-linked
References 6, 8, 10 → "Beijing 2008" should not be italicized
- UF Athletics was not wikilinked. Also, as Beijing 2008 was italicized by default by the cite web template, I removed them altogether. ESPN has been wikilinked.

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues that you believe do not concern good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 22:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have addressed all of your comments. Thank you for reviewing the article. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 22:55, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome job on responding so quickly. All issues have been addressed, so I will pass the article. Keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 22:59, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]