Talk:Superforecaster

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Futures studies Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Removal of Template:More citations needed[edit]

I'm going to remove this as in my opinion it is very misleading for an article that is reasonably fully cited as it is a WP:VAGUEWAVE. While its technically within the scope of the use of the template when most content is cited it is far better to cited individual sections: While I personally think at the time of this post the lede and Etomology section do not need citing I accept others may take a different view may wish to use e.g. Template:fact which is more precise at the problem areas. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 05:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merging[edit]

To state the nearly obvious in case anyone believes they have a possibly non-contentious merge it I am almost certain to contend it, see WP:MERGEPROP but obviously will respect consensus. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 05:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New references and things[edit]

One of the key things superforecasters were hailed as good at was predicting pandemics, and I'm far from sure superforecasters have had a good covid-19 but I'm we need WP:RS to avalyze that. The following time magazine article by Tara Law may have some content usable in the article in it; but use needs to be clear. The article also leads to Good Judgement open and Metaculus. [1]. These are recorded for possible later article improvement. Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:16, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]