Talk:Super High Me

Cannabis Low‑importance

	Cannabis portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Documentary / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

This article was a collaboration for WikiProject Cannabis during September 1–September 15, 2009.

Image[edit]

I have no problems if someone wants to find a proper-sized image to us on the right, but the current picture looks very unprofessional and doesn't conform to Wiki page formats at all. Removing for the time being. Tegrenath (talk) 02:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Endless Dan 02:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Posehn[edit]

He was involved too, right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.63.142 (talk) 18:31, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So was the sun. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.111.82.98 (talk) 21:48, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ya he was when they were eating the burger. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.73.84.85 (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy needs some work...[edit]

"In this movie Doug Benson smokes Marijuana. Marijuana is a controversial topic in America." Really? Nothing more than that? Ugh I may try and dig up some sources when I get a spare minute, but in case that doesn't happen..yeah.

Statistics et al.[edit]

A previous editor had said that Benson's ESP score improved because he scored 7/25 rather than 1/25. That's not necessarily so: Statistically, an unusually *low* score might be just as important as an unusually *high* score.

I also changed the assertion that his health was "unaffected". A weight gain of eight pounds in a month is a statistically unusual effect. I changed it to "generally inconsequential", which I think is more accurate. --tgeller (talk) 01:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Important" in what way? Shiggity (talk) 12:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that doesn't make sense. Incidentally, I think he took the test around day 14 - marijuana does stay in the system and marijuana withdrawal could hurt results on some tests. Although psychic tests are really pointless. He took the "mini-mental status" at day 24 or 25. II | (t - c) 07:33, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A weight fluctuation of that size is probably of varying significance based on the participant. Seems the person most qualified to make a statement on this is Benson's own physician. 208.118.163.99 (talk) 16:53, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notably unusual[edit]

"His "sober" score was 1 correct guess out of 25, which is notably unusual."

That really depends on how many choices there were, doesn't it? Did they ever say? Shiggity (talk) 12:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake in synopsis?[edit]

The article says, "Benson took various tests to gauge his physical and mental health both before 30 days of not smoking cannabis, and after doing so for 30 days straight." Uh… shouldn't that be: "both after 30 days of not smoking cannabis, and after doing so for 30 days"? - dcljr (talk) 09:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Answering my own question (now that I've seen the movie): It wasn't before or after, but during the 30-day period (actually, both 30-day periods). - dcljr (talk) 08:03, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Super High Me. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100818211554/http://www.friendsofsteveandmichelle.com:80/what-happened-on-january-28-20 to http://www.friendsofsteveandmichelle.com/what-happened-on-january-28-20/
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/film/reviews/article_display.jsp?&rid=11006

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:27, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]