Talk:Super-resolution imaging

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electrical engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Visualization.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Hyphen or not[edit]

The unhyphenated form superresolution, used even at the beginning of the subject ^[1], seems now to have superseded the less-often used super-resolution -- see Optics Info Base. I propose that the redirect be not from superresolution to super-resolution but the other way. If the abbreviation SR is used in the rest of the entry, there should be no problem.Gwestheimer 16:30, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

^ McCutchen C. J. opt. Soc. Am. 57:1190, 1967

Trying for an entry that gives an overall layout of the subject and conveys the essential concepts, I have opted for a separate page entitled "Superresolution" rather than shoehorning the material into the current more technically-oriented page "Super-resolution." This involves undoing the re-direct from "Superresolution" to "Super-resolution" and inserting into each of these pages a reference to the other under "See also."
Gwestheimer 18:23, 19 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwestheimer (talk • contribs)

That was a terrible idea. There is no reason why we can't have both the technical and the non-technical in the same article. And then to have the only difference be the hyphen is even worse. I'm recombining the pages. Ego White Tray (talk) 12:39, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't disagree with Ego White Tray, to the contrary, that was my original intent, except that I found the job of integrating the two entries and dealing with the tags and the many self-serving references too daunting. But I will now have a go at it. So Wiki-constabulary, please hold off tagging for a week or two.Gwestheimer 22:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwestheimer (talk • contribs)

More on which techniques for which applications[edit]

Which techniques are used on aerial photography or on satellite imagery or for optical astronomy ? Is multi-frame SR the main technique ? Are there SR techniques specific to enhancing video ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:30, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The 2nd sentence of the intro is long, and perhaps too complicated for the intro ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:30, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question on introduction[edit]

Are MRI and Computed Tomography really examples of radar/sonar applications? - Evariste1832 (talk) 12:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] McCutchen C. J. opt. Soc. Am. 57:1190, 1967

[1]