Talk:Stupid Spoiled Whore Video Playset

Animation: American / Television / Computer Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Park Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Park, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South Park on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South ParkWikipedia:WikiProject South ParkTemplate:WikiProject South ParkSouth Park articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Animation / Television / Colorado

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to improve, create, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the New section tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

plot too long[edit]

what the hell is going on? We don't need to recap every single detail!—Preceding unsigned comment added by What's up Dr. Strangelove (talk • contribs)

Then do something about it? ≈ The Haunted Angel 15:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just did, I reorganized it and dropped some parts out. kardworx (talk) 09:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scrambles, Paris Hilton's "pet"[edit]

Scrambles was not a cat, he was a collie. I know because Paris said in the episode "Another DOG killed itself!" This means that all her pets were dogs. Grieferhate 11:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is enough for (the last) two of them to be dogs for tinkerbell to be "another dog" that killed itself. blades (talk) 10:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that the amount Hilton offers for Butters is inconsistent. First she offers his parents $200,000,000, but later, the article states that Butters parents are angry for losing $250,000,000. Which is it? 7-14-07 -Underdog5004

In the episode Paris offered the Stoch's $200m for Butter, the Stoch's initially declined but quickly told Paris they would accept $250m, so what is written is correct, it looks like the article may have been re-written since your comment.

There seems to be something unrelated to the article right down the bottom. Text is as shown: "It is reported that if Paris Hilton were dead, Osama Bin Laden would be dead, global warming would be extinct, and I would have $50,000 to pay for my four years in college." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.240.89.254 (talk • contribs)

It wasn't on the article, it was part of the Paris Hilton template - I've removed it now. Thanks for pointing it out! ≈ The Haunted Angel 17:13, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:812StupidSpoiledWhoreVideo.jpg[edit]

Image:812StupidSpoiledWhoreVideo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect[edit]

I have redirected this episode because it was comprised mainly of plot, and had little to no outside information on the episode. The workers who sculpted the article's efforts were not in vain, though. The episode's contents now exist identically in South Park Wiki. Just so you know. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited material[edit]

Cite and return to the cite page;

While Butters digs for coal, he sings a song that resembles "Sixteen Tons", using a combination of the original lyrics and his own ("You work eighteen hours/What do you get?/Your parents sell you/to Paris Hilton").
The Stupid Spoiled Whore Video Playset is made by Letcher-Price, a parody of Fisher-Price. The cover includes four girls styled like Bratz.
The ending scene (Paris Hilton in Mr. Slave's anus, encountering the Frog King) is a reference to South Park ep. 614 (The Death Camp of Tolerance), where the class pet Lemmiwinks meets a similar fate but finally escapes Mr. Slaves intestines, in turn a reference to the 1977 Rankin/Bass animated adaptation of The Hobbit. The ending song is also taken from that episode, with slightly changed lyrics.

Alastairward (talk) 14:23, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a point of view I don't understand. When someone quotes something which happens in the episode, what more cite can there be? I suppose there must be a way to cite the episode. How does that work? - Denimadept (talk) 16:18, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a point of view supported by the verifiability policy. If one wishes to add something to the article that can't be proved, then one shouldn't. Where one gets a citation from is not something I can or should advise upon. I cannot see how a simple direct quote of the episode is sufficient citation for the so called "cultural references" above, they require some speculation, which requires a reference to support. Alastairward (talk) 22:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous. I come to Wikipedia to look up information on an episode of a show, I expect to find something more than just a simple plot summary. It's often the information that gets cut out like this that I find the most interesting, as it at least attempts to address some of my questions about said episodes. This sort of illogical logic is one of the main reasons the South Park entries on Wikipedia are so lacking in interesting information. How far of a stretch does one need to go before Letcher Price becomes anything OTHER than Fisher Price? In fact, most of the removed information I've seen on this pages are either backed up within the episodes themselves, or are so blatently obvious that you'd have to be blind not to pick up on it. Perhaps Wikipedia should re-examine some of its policies and how they apply to various situations. What would you suggest then, a link to Fisher Price? An image showing both logos next to each other? Dakmordian (talk) 20:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the subject of citations....there are two items under the "Notes" section that clearly state the information is taken from DVD commentary on the episode, and yet the items are marked "citation needed". Why? Does there have to be an internet source for a citation to be valid? I've seen any number of citations on Wikipedia from print media--why should DVDs be any different? It's still valid information, verifiable by consulting the media in question. -- Pennyforth (talk) 21:42, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paris Hilton's reaction to the episode[edit]

I am curious if there is an update to Paris Hilton's reaction to the episode. Her last quote showed she was flattered. Has she seen the episode as of yet? Sorry if I edited this wrong as I am a Wikipedia noob. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ERIC S4646 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]