Talk:Stuart & Sons

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: New South Wales / Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Stuart & Sons is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

This article: pretty bad for a number of reasons. Is someone going to fix it? Tony (talk) 11:13, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox is a real problem. Rainbow1000, do you have an interest in the company, either as employee, friend or relative? The image uploaded and added today lacks proper documentation. Who, where, when, for example. Tony (talk) 07:08, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can authoritative sources be found for the technical descriptions and claims, please? Newpapers? Even a professional newsletter would be better than the pianoworld.com blog. I've removed one pic, but there are still too many for an article of this size, and I am suspicious about the documentation at the Commons. It needs to be fixed before the remaining images can be considered for retention. Tony (talk) 08:49, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rainbow1000: are you "Chris" (CJM) at the blog that is cited again and again. Are you, in fact, citing yourself? Please see my query on your talk page about your claim at the Commons that the images are your own work. Perhaps they are, but it would be good to clear up the matter—they look like professional marketing photographs. Tony (talk) 08:59, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cites added. Happy now or is more needed? Thoglette (talk) 00:52, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Stuart and Sons article[edit]

This article Stuart & Sons should be merged with the Stuart and sons article. Damon Mah (talk) 08:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree—merge away. Note also that a previous article Stuart and Sons was moved to Stuart & Sons by Rainbow1000 (see here, also discussion above) the day before Rainbow1000 created Stuart and sons (see here). There seems to be something suspicious going on.shaidar cuebiyar ( talk | contribs ) 22:39, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes; why on earth are there two articles? Tony (talk) 10:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SEO ? --195.137.93.171 (talk) 07:48, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why hasn't someone played Scriabin's sixth sonata on one of these?[edit]

It has a written D8, which AFAIK is only possible on a Stuart & Sons 102-key piano. Double sharp (talk) 01:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also Scriabin's Op. 39 No. 4 has a G♯0, but that can be done on Bösendorfer 225s and Imperials as well. Double sharp (talk) 15:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]