Talk:Statue of John Plankinton/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 20:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Taking this review. MWright96 (talk) 20:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead[edit]

  • "It took the sculptor six months to make" - mention the sculptor's name on the first mention
  • Wikilink Plankinton Arcade to the appropriate article
  • "he latest redevelopment of the property occurred in 1980-1982" - 1980 to 1982
  • "and placed on a 15-foot pedestal" - same issue as the first point in this section

Background[edit]

  • Mention what Plankinton was on the first mention of him in this section
 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "had already done statues for the Plankinton family so was commissioned" - think there is a comma missing between "family" and "so"
 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Park made the six-foot bronze statue" - same issue as the first and fifth points in the lead section
 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "and originally promoted by businessman" - was originally
 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "It had billiard and bowling" - think there is a word or two missing from this portion of text
 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The property was again renamed and then called Shops of Grand Avenue" - the word in bold is not needed in my opinion
 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The latest redesign of the property in 1980–1982" - between 1980 and 1982
 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Grand Avenue was the 19th century prestigious street name where the property is located" - Grand Avenue was the name of a 19th-century prestigious street
 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "and is now Wisconsin Avenue." - now called
 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The statue on its 15-foot pedestal" - similiar issue to the first and fifth points in the lead section
 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "and seen by hundreds daily." - and is viewed
 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

  • References 1, 6, 7, 9 and 10 are missing the page numbers
  • The date for Reference 3 is incorrect
  • The date for Reference 5 is incomplete
  • Also Refs 2 and 7 appear to be the exact same story but published in different newspapers on different days?

Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address/query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 14:48, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.